bildung.social ist einer von vielen unabhängigen Mastodon-Servern, mit dem du dich im Fediverse beteiligen kannst.
Bildung unter den Bedingungen der digitalen Transformation.

Verwaltet von:

Serverstatistik:

848
aktive Profile

#fascism

483 Beiträge269 Beteiligte56 Beiträge heute
Fortgeführter Thread

So, if you were wondering whether there's anything hypothetical about the "chilling effect" all this fascist repression is designed to produce in folks who oppose the Trump regime, a recent Guardian article demonstrates that it's real and ongoing - not just for anti-genocide protestors and foreign students, but for US-born critics of the regime writing in college papers too:

theguardian.com/us-news/2025/a

US student journalists go dark fearing Trump crusade against pro-Palestinian speech

"Fearing legal repercussions, online harassment and professional consequences, student journalists are retracting their names from published articles amid intensifying repression by the Trump administration targeting students perceived to be associated with the pro-Palestinian movement.

Editors at university newspapers say that anxiety among writers has risen since the arrest of the Tufts University graduate student Rumeysa Ozturk, who is currently in Immigration and Customs Enforcement (Ice) detention fighting efforts to deport her. While the government has not pointed to evidence supporting its decision to revoke her visa, she wrote an op-ed last year in a student newspaper critical of Israel, spurring fears that simply expressing views in writing is now viewed as sufficient grounds for deportation.

Ozturk is one of nearly a dozen students or scholars who have been seized by immigration officials since 8 March, when Mahmoud Khalil, a Columbia graduate student and green card holder, was arrested and placed in deportation proceedings over his role in pro-Palestinian protests. Student editors report particularly acute anxieties among international students who have contributed to their newspapers, but say that requests to take down stories over fears of retaliation are coming from US citizens, too."

The reality that no authoritarian regime wants dissidents to realize, is that they literally do not have the resources to police and punish *everyone* who opposes the state. What they rely on is cracking down on high profile targets that generate a lot of publicity, folks like Mahmoud Khalil, and Rumeysa Ozturk, to force everyone else to self censor, lest they be next. I'm not going to criticize the student writers for asking college newspapers at institutions that have shown no ability or willingness to protect them, to erase their critiques of the regime to protect their personal safety; very few people in our society are actually prepared to suffer the horrible consequences of a fascist police state targeting them personally, and a lot of people reading this would make the same decision in their shoes.

What I will say however is that this response is exactly what the fascist Trump regime wants, and that's why it behooves the rest of society to give a fuck about the free speech rights of student protestors and journalists; and act in numbers large enough to protect us all while working to stop this fascist repression by any means necessary.

The Guardian · US student journalists go dark fearing Trump crusade against pro-Palestinian speechVon Guardian staff reporter
Fortgeführter Thread

Did the celebration of might, power, guns, weapons, the military, strutting, coarse manliness make you queasy?

Did you wonder where all this would end, the need to see more and more people as the enemy, the justification of lies, cruelty, ruthlessness? The supervision of citizens, so that you had to watch everything you did or said for fear you, too, would be rounded up?

Or was it easier just to go along with it all?

#Trump #fascism #militarism #violence #Nazis
/3

Fortgeführter Thread

What did you hear in church on Sundays? What did your priest or pastor say? Did they talk about how Christian symbols and Jesus himself were being twisted and misrepresented to justify the rampage of hate and cruelty that were fueling the regime?

When almost everything that you were told was a lie, how did you hold onto your sanity, your moral center?

#Trump #fascism #militarism #violence #Nazis
/2

What was it like, Mother, Father, to live in a country that quickly turned itself into a military camp after he rose to power claiming God had placed him there?

Did you see what was coming? How did you prepare?

What did you think when some people living among you were targeted, rounded up, sent away? Did you think about what was happening to them, why this was being done?

#Trump #fascism #militarism #violence #Nazis
/1

Fortgeführter Thread

In a move that demonstrates mainstream Democrat politicians have learned absolutely nothing from helping to build a fascist police state panopticon, and the migrant carceral complex, before shitting themselves so hard they lost to a would-be dictator like Trump, Massachusetts Dems have quietly passed a trans student sports ban timebomb and are trying to sell it as a victory for protecting trans rights:

erininthemorning.com/p/massach

Massachusetts House Dems Pass Bill That Could Ban Trans Students From Sports; Senate Next

"On Wednesday, the Massachusetts House of Representatives passed a $1.3 billion budget bill that included a transgender sports ban—the first such measure to pass any legislative chamber in a blue state. Rather than voting to strike down the provision, Democrats advanced an amendment allowing the ban to go into effect only after its impacts are studied. Party leaders framed the move as a win for transgender rights, claiming the study would never materialize and the ban was effectively dead. But critics argue the provision puts transgender people at risk if political winds shift or future administrations decide to act on the study. Discussions suggest Democrats chose the procedural maneuver to shield members in swing districts from casting a vote in support of transgender rights."

Are you fucking kidding me? Let me see if I understand this correctly. In the middle of a state-sanctioned, anti-trans pogrom being conducted by fascists who have already declared that trans people don't exist, and openly admitted they're trying to drive trans people from public life, (two things that historically have preceded the direct extermination of marginalized groups), a solidly blue state government full of supposed "liberals" just passed an anti-trans law they promise not to actually enforce, because - they don't want to go on record standing up for the human rights of trans people as doing so is unpopular? Did I get that right? So the reason you decided to literally provide ideological support for an anti-trans pogrom is that you're cowards, and that makes it okay somehow? Quick question; if launching Chuck Schumer into the sun polled well, would you folks be afraid to oppose that on record too, or are you only cowards when we're talking about the human rights of trans people?

Look, if American liberals don't want me to point out that the war on trans rights (which aids a real as fuck anti-trans pogrom being conducted by the fascist right) is a bipartisan initiative, they need to start telling the political leaders they insist I *have* to vote for to stand up for trans people being targeted by a nazi moral panic with eliminationist characteristics; it's gotta be you folks, because it's clear as fucking day that the Democratic Party as a whole isn't listening to trans people like me.

Erin In The Morning · Massachusetts House Dems Pass Bill That Could Ban Trans Students From Sports; Senate NextVon Erin Reed

David Smith: ‘If there’s #fascism we need to call it out’: #Delaware governor on post-Biden world: Matt Meyer finds himself playing Whac-A-Mole as he deals with Trump’s capricious actions while pursuing an ambitious agenda of his own

#MattMeyer #democracy #uspol #resistance
theguardian.com/us-news/2025/a

The Guardian · ‘If there’s fascism we need to call it out’: Delaware governor on post-Biden worldVon David Smith
Fortgeführter Thread

"An email sent to thousands of people yesterday by the Department of Homeland Security escalates the abuse. The automated note refers to the 'termination of parole' and seeks to frighten its recipients by warning that if they don’t leave the U.S. 'immediately you will be subject to potential law enforcement actions that will result in your removal.'”

~ Steven Beschloss

#Trump #fascism #immigrants #military #border #InsurrectionAct #HomelandSecurity
/13

americaamerica.news/p/whose-am

America, America · Whose America Is This Anyway?Von Steven Beschloss
Fortgeführter Thread

In what may well be one of the most shameful episodes in American legal history since the abolition of chattel slavery, a Louisiana immigration judge has ruled that the Trump regime can continue its blatantly unconstitutional deportation of a lawful permanent US resident and political prisoner, Mahmoud Khalil, pretty much because Marco Rubio says so:

commondreams.org/news/mahmoud-

'Very Dark Stuff': Judge Rules Palestine Activist Mahmoud Khalil Can Be Deported

"A U.S. immigration judge in Louisiana on Friday ruled that Mahmoud Khalil, a permanent U.S. resident and former Columbia University graduate student arrested last month after protesting Israel's genocidal assault on Gaza, can be deported, a decision that came despite the Trump administration admitting the imminently expecting father committed no crime and was being targeted solely for constitutionally protected speech.

Assistant Chief Immigration Judge Jamee Comans said that she lacked the legal authority to question the determination by Secretary of State Marco Rubio that Khalil was deportable. Earlier this week, Comans gave the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) until Friday to produce evidence that Khalil is eligible for deportation.

No such evidence was provided other than Rubio's assertion that he reserves the right to order Khalil's expulsion under the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, which empowers the secretary of state to expel noncitizens whose presence in the United States is deemed detrimental to U.S. foreign policy interests."

As the article itself notes, this isn't a final victory for the Trump administration; Khalil can and will continue to fight this, and most legal experts seem pretty confident this is all going to end up in front of the Supreme Court before the government can actually deport him; although why the court's 6-3 fascist high composition gives anyone confidence that they'll stop the regime's fascist and blatantly unconstitutional ideological policing and repression, is somewhat beyond me. As horrifying as this decision is, a random immigration judge doesn't get to say "surprise, fascism is legal now" even if that's more or less what this ruling is pointing to.

With that having been noted however, I need folks to understand what the regime's successful (for now) argument is here, because if you don't get that, it's impossible to grasp just how far these nazis clearly mean to go with this. The government is admitting that Mahmoud Khalil had a legal right to be in the United States, and committed no crime whatsoever. They are expressly stating that he's being targeted for deportation because of his political beliefs, and opposition to the US-back genocide being conducted by Israel, against Palestinians in Gaza as we speak; which they have chosen to define as antisemitism for political and propaganda reasons. This is a fundamental denial of Khalil's First Amendment rights which regardless of what you heard on Fox News, apply to everyone in the United States, not just people born there.

Despite this however, the regime is arguing that they have the right to deport Khalil because the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 gives the Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, the right to unilaterally, even unconstitutionally, order Khalil's expulsion; citing that the Act empowers him "to expel noncitizens whose presence in the United States is deemed detrimental to U.S. foreign policy interests." Who decides what US foreign policy interests are, has a right to to declare those decisions state secrets, and can change those potentially secret objectives at a whim? The Trump regime. Who decides which actions are "detrimental" to U.S. foreign policy decisions and who should be deported for them? Well the regime's argument is that it's Marco Rubio or whoever happens to be Trump's Secretary of State, and that he can do it by a whim, without explaining or justifying his decisions whatsoever.

So you caught that right? The regime can violate the constitutional rights of even a lawful US resident, because Marco Rubio feels a way, and he's not required to provide any more proof than "I said so." And yesterday, a U.S. immigration judge agreed with that logic. All of which now begs the question, what, or who, will Little Marco decide is "detrimental to U.S. foreign policy decisions" tomorrow?

Common Dreams · 'Very Dark Stuff': Judge Rules Palestine Activist Mahmoud Khalil Can Be Deported | Common Dreams"If Mahmoud can be targeted in this way, simply for speaking out for Palestinians and exercising his constitutionally protected right to free speech, this can happen to anyone," one of his lawyers warned.
#Fascism#Trump#Immigration

“These legal orientation programs are often the ONLY way that immigrants held in detention can talk with a lawyer.”
-A Reichlin-Melnick

Trump & the oligarchs are pocketing millions from private detention facilities (prison camps). Denying asylum to undocumented immigrants by various nefarious means, guarantees the need for more facilities & everything that’s required to operate them.

#Immigrants#Detention#DHS
Fortgeführter Thread

"Wall Street fund managers are concerned that Trump might be clinically insane. The New Republic highlighted recent statements made from managers who think that Trump’s behavior indicates he might’ve lost his marbles."

~ Ron Filipkowski

#Trump #fascism #immigrants #military #tariffs #WallStreet #StockMarket #MentalStability
/11

meidasplus.com/p/today-in-poli

Meidas+ · Today in Politics, Bulletin 110. 4/11/25Von Ron Filipkowski
Fortgeführter Thread

“'There is no indication that Congress contemplated an immigration judge or even an attorney general overruling the Secretary of State on matters of foreign policy,' said Judge Comans as she made her ruling [permitting Trump to deport Mahmoud Khalil]."

~ Delaney Nolan

#Trump #fascism #immigrants #MahmoudKhalil #violence #cruelty
/8

zeteo.com/p/breaking-mahmoud-k

Zeteo · BREAKING: Mahmoud Khalil Can Be Deported, Immigration Judge RulesVon Delaney Nolan